5845 <a href="http://www.archive.org/movies/details-db.php?collection=prelinger&collectionid=1960_kennedy-nixon_2">Part II</A> Next Melkor 2003-08-28 03:39:31 2003-08-28 03:38:48 4 8656 Downloaded the MPEG2...Video is great but audio is missing from Part I. Kennedy-Nixon Debate Part I Dennis57 2004-01-13 07:05:33 2004-01-13 07:04:33 2 12254 mpeg-4 audio is messed up. Sounds like chipmunks. Part II is okay. bad audio Scantron 2004-04-26 21:31:57 2004-04-26 21:31:57 2 18415 What's going on here. With this stream the audio is too fast. I tried to stream some of the Panucci montages earlier on and the audio was running too slowly. Does anyone maintain this site?? Audio at wrong speed ixnayontheottenray 2004-08-08 18:55:50 2004-08-08 18:55:50 1 Esta pelicula tiene 00:16:11 mins. del cual el sonido tiene una duracion de 8:31 seg. (Por eso tiene un sonido acelerado). Por eso para prevenir ese problema y hacer que el sonido es correcto, uds pueden seguir estos pasos: Necesitan estos programas. 1: TMPGEnc: (Para editar la pelicula en Mpg, VCD) 2: Goldwave: (Editor de audio) Primero debemos pasar la pelicula sin editar, solo descomprimimos el audio, cancelamos la edicion y vamos a File/Output to File/Wave File. (Aca pasamos el sonido en Wave), ahora vamos al Goldwave y vemos que el sonido tiene una duracion aprox de 8 minutos, del cual dura 16 minutos (duracion video) el resto es sin sonido. Borramos el fragmento sin sonido y tenemos la parte con sonido pero con el sonido rapido, ahora vamos a la seccion "Playback Rate" y ponemos aprox. 20400 (casi similar a esto, ahora no recuerdo cual es el correcto. Debe durar 16:11:804) en esta opcion el Goldwave va a poner casi (en milisegundos) 16:11:800. una vez que pongamos "lento" el sonido debemos ver si dura la misma velocidad del video, si es asi debemos grabar el audio (resample) en el formato correcto que el TMPEGEnc lea. Una vez que sea compatible vamos al programa mencionado y editamos el video y ponemos el sonido que editamos, y configuramos el video a gusto. Una nota adicional: Al relentizar el audio posiblemente pierda un poco la calidad, esto es porque es "Rapido" a "Lento". Espero que estas instrucciones puedan servir de algo. Detalles tecnicos y como editarlo correctamente. 1 Guillermo A. Martinez (de Argentina) 2005-06-09 14:39:04 2005-06-09 14:39:04 OK, I've fixed the audio for this program (with our new deriver). --tracey, webmaster Audio is fixed! 4 tracey pooh 2005-10-04 12:43:07 2005-10-04 12:43:07 I use this for my high school history class, and project it on a big screen, however the larger downloadable MPEG2 does not have any sound attached. This site has a number of excellent primary resources, this being one, however it was a major disappointment that I wasn't able to use it. No Sound on Download jdreier933 2007-04-16 15:08:01 2007-04-16 15:08:01 3 [\s sound clip of Kennedy-Nixon is the most ludicrous piece of shit I have ever listened to. Not only is the audio quality TERRIBLE, AND I MEAN TERRIBLE, who gives a shit about these two?? Not me. don't download this shit it is a waste of your time. -Musa aboutalep I Can't Even Describe It royyor 2007-05-21 20:52:11 2007-05-21 20:52:11 1 I can't believe the attitude expressed by some of the reviewers here...this is a free resource of thousands of films, do you have any idea how much work it takes to maintain it? The archive relies of users to alert them to problems, not to make snide comments and unreasonable demands of a FREE resource... Regardless of what you think of Nixon and Kennedy, it is a part of history that need to be easily available...should we just burn the films just 'cause we find them distasteful? Perhaps we should delete Hitler from the history books as well... lack of appreciation Scribble 2007-11-11 22:23:36 2007-11-11 22:23:36 4 There is a version with cleaned-up, enhanced picture and sound available here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TIwaKfzS2c Digitally restored debate FP 2008-11-08 14:22:23 2008-11-08 14:22:23 5 I too agree that it is simply ridiculous for people to be complaining about sound quality and whatnot. Give me a break you guys are losers. Show some respect soulkitch 2009-02-18 00:41:31 2009-02-18 00:41:31 5 Kennedy sounds a lot more conservative than I remembered at that time. He and Nixon were worthy opponents but they were definitely facing the future with courage and hope. Appearance wise Kennedy looked more at ease than Nixon but laws are signed behind closed doors by people holding pens in their hands, without cameras recording hairdos and suite colors. A chance to see how things were 1StepBeyond 2009-07-24 14:40:40 2009-07-24 14:40:40 5 Nixon was coming from the hospital due to illness and did not shave. Kennedy was tanned and rested and had the benefit of studio makeup. Those who watched the debate thought Kennedy had one, those that heard it on the radio thought Nixon won. I heard this on the radio and thought it was interesting. Great debate NoiseCollector 2009-12-03 22:37:43 2009-12-03 22:37:43 5 13 3.23